/

DIVISLAB.NS Divi's Laboratories Limited

India INR·Price 6719.00·Mkt cap 1.78T
47funnel
as of 2026-06-16
Key numbers
Market cap
₹1,78,368 Cr
Current price
₹6,719
52w high / low
Stock P/E
69.5
Book value
₹631.37
P/B
10.6
ROCE
16.6%
ROE
15.3%

Computed from the latest reported financials and the current market price.

Who's the real player?

Strong90

A genuine play on this theme — most of its business sits right here.

API / Bulk Drugs~85% core revenue

Is the business healthy?

Weak49

Shaky fundamentals — weak cash generation or a stretched balance sheet. Tread carefully.

  • Weak FCF conversion (<50% of net income turns into free cash)
cashflow quality: 35.3capital efficiency: 57.4growth quality: 100balance sheet: 77.8valuation: 0
FCF conversion
8.5%
FCF margin
2.1%
Accrual ratio
-0.9%
ROCE
16.6%
ROIC
13.6%
Net debt / EBITDA
-0.0
Interest coverage
129.5
Revenue CAGR
Piotroski F
4
Altman Z
54.5
P / FCF
818.2
EV / EBITDA
46.0
  • Strong growth quality
  • Healthy balance sheet
  • Positive accrual ratio

Are the smart people buying?

Strong70

No ownership-change data for this stock. The score reflects heavy growth investment (capex) and buybacks, not visible insider buying.

Capex growth 75.2%Ownership-change data not available for this stock.
  • Promoter or insider stake at 52.02%
  • Insider net buys of 12,963,053
  • Capex growth of 75.24%
  • Strong ownership concentration

What is management saying?

No earnings-call transcript or filings found for this stock.

Is the price right?

expensive0

Intrinsic value 95.49 vs price 6719.00 — screens expensive on a cash-flow DCF (-98.6% to intrinsic). The base FCF growth assumption of 0% appears conservative, but without knowing the reverse-DCF implied growth, it's unclear if this is believable.

Intrinsic / share95.49
Price6719.00
Upside to intrinsic-98.6%
Reverse-DCF implied g50.0%

Base FCF 2.30B · growth 0.0% · discount 12.0% · terminal 5.0%.

Sensitivity — intrinsic value / share

Each cell is the intrinsic value at that growth (across →) and discount rate (down ↓). Center ★ is the base case. Cells green = above price (cheap), red = below (expensive).

Growth rate →
Disc ↓ ╲ g-4%-2%0%2%4%
10%95.51110.49128.12148.82173.11
11%82.6494.84109.13125.86145.42
12%73.3383.5595.49109.4125.62
13%66.2675.0185.1997.02110.76
14%60.6968.377.1287.3499.18

Through the masters' eyes

Each investor's numeric rules, checked against this stock's metrics: exact math, no guesswork. Tap one to see which rules pass, fail, and what to judge yourself.

Peter LynchGARP — PEG + the six stock types100Would like it

Passes 2 of 2 of Peter Lynch's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • Manageable debt (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0
  • Solid liquidity (current ratio ≥ 1.5) — now 5.43
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • A simple business you understand
  • Which 'type' it is (fast grower, stalwart, cyclical…)
  • A believable growth story

Couldn't check from available data: PEG ≤ 1 (growth cheap vs price) — not available; Earnings growth ≥ 15% — not available

Vijay KediaSMILE — small, scalable, growth midcaps100Would like it

Passes 2 of 2 of Vijay Kedia's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • ROE ≥ 15% — now 15.3%
  • Manageable debt (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • Ambitious, capable management
  • A small company with a large opportunity
  • Patience to hold for years

Couldn't check from available data: Strong earnings growth ≥ 20% — not available

Warren BuffettMargin of Safety + the Four Filters80Would like it

Passes 4 of 5 of Warren Buffett's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • ROE ≥ 15% — now 15.3%
  • Net margin ≥ 10% — now 24.3%
  • Positive free cash flow — now 2.1%
  • Conservative leverage (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0
✕ Fails
  • Trades below intrinsic value (margin of safety ≥ 0) — now -6936.6%
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • A business you can understand
  • A durable competitive moat
  • Honest, capable management
Charlie MungerThe Four Filters + Quality75Would like it

Passes 3 of 4 of Charlie Munger's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • High returns on capital (ROCE ≥ 15%) — now 16.6%
  • ROE ≥ 15% — now 15.3%
  • Conservative leverage (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0
✕ Fails
  • Trades below intrinsic value (margin of safety ≥ 0) — now -6936.6%
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • A high-quality, understandable business
  • A durable moat
  • Management of integrity
Radhakishan DamaniQuiet value in durable franchises75Would like it

Passes 3 of 4 of Radhakishan Damani's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • Very low debt (D/E ≤ 0.5) — now 0
  • Consistent revenue (consistency ≥ 80%) — now 92.5%
  • Positive net margin — now 24.3%
✕ Fails
  • High returns on capital (ROCE ≥ 18%) — now 16.6%
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • A durable consumer franchise
  • Pricing power
  • A long runway, bought patiently
Rakesh JhunjhunwalaHigh-conviction Indian quality-growth67Mixed

Passes 2 of 3 of Rakesh Jhunjhunwala's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • Net margin ≥ 10% — now 24.3%
  • Conservative leverage (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0
✕ Fails
  • ROE ≥ 18% — now 15.3%
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • A large, scalable opportunity
  • Trustworthy, ambitious management
  • Conviction to hold through volatility

Couldn't check from available data: Earnings growth ≥ 15% — not available

Benjamin GrahamGraham Number / Net-Net Value50Mixed

Passes 3 of 6 of Benjamin Graham's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • Strong liquidity (current ratio ≥ 1.5) — now 5.43
  • Debt below equity (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0
  • Financially safe (Altman Z ≥ 3) — now 54.47
✕ Fails
  • P/E ≤ 15 — now 68.84
  • P/B ≤ 1.5 — now 10.55
  • Graham number: P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 — now 726.3
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • A long record of stable earnings
  • An uninterrupted dividend history
Raamdeo AgrawalQGLP — Quality, Growth, Longevity, Price50Mixed

Passes 1 of 2 of Raamdeo Agrawal's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.

✓ Passes
  • Longevity: revenue consistency ≥ 70% — now 92.5%
✕ Fails
  • Quality: ROCE ≥ 18% — now 16.6%
⚖ Judge for yourself (can't be measured)
  • Durability of the growth (longevity)
  • Quality and honesty of management

Couldn't check from available data: Growth: earnings CAGR ≥ 15% — not available; Price: PEG ≤ 2 — not available

Financial statements (INR)

source

Cash-flow lines highlighted — we trust cash over reported profit.

Line20262025202420232022
Revenue105.60B93.60B77.96B76.65B
Operating income29.78B25.66B18.32B20.27B
EBITDA38.74B33.20B25.44B27.12B
Net income25.68B21.91B16.00B18.24B
Operating cash flow27.38B16.53B12.61B24.59B
Capex-25.20B-14.38B-10.03B-4.73B
Free cash flow2.18B2.15B2.58B19.86B
Total assets200.33B169.32B154.70B144.39B
Total equity167.61B149.69B135.71B127.67B
Total debt70.00M40.00M30.00M40.00M
Cash & equivalents1.28B4.15B3.63B1.70B

Technical entry