SIEMENS.NS Siemens Limited
Computed from the latest reported financials and the current market price.
Who's the real player?
A genuine play on this theme — most of its business sits right here.
Is the business healthy?
Shaky fundamentals — weak cash generation or a stretched balance sheet. Tread carefully.
- ⚠Weak FCF conversion (<50% of net income turns into free cash)
- Strong growth quality
- Healthy balance sheet
- Positive returns on capital
Are the smart people buying?
No ownership-change data for this stock. Conviction is judged from capex and buyback signals alone.
- High promoter/insider stake
- Capex growth of 11.13%
- Institutional ownership at 10.66%
What is management saying?
No earnings-call transcript or filings found for this stock.
Is the price right?
Intrinsic value 713.95 vs price 3642.30 — screens expensive on a cash-flow DCF (-80.4% to intrinsic). The base FCF growth assumption of 8% is plausible but needs to be compared with historical performance and industry trends for validation.
| Intrinsic / share | 713.95 |
| Price | 3642.30 |
| Upside to intrinsic | -80.4% |
| Reverse-DCF implied g | 31.5% |
Base FCF 12.55B · growth 8.0% · discount 12.0% · terminal 5.0%.
Sensitivity — intrinsic value / share
Each cell is the intrinsic value at that growth (across →) and discount rate (down ↓). Center ★ is the base case. Cells green = above price (cheap), red = below (expensive).
| Growth rate → | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disc ↓ ╲ g | 4% | 6% | 8% | 10% | 12% |
| 10% | 741 | 856.49 | 991.47 | 1148.95 | 1332.33 |
| 11% | 628.53 | 721.28 | 829.39 | 955.21 | 1101.4 |
| 12% | 548.11 | 624.8 | ★ 713.95 | 817.47 | 937.47 |
| 13% | 487.72 | 552.52 | 627.65 | 714.67 | 815.32 |
| 14% | 440.69 | 496.36 | 560.74 | 635.13 | 720.99 |
Through the masters' eyes
Each investor's numeric rules, checked against this stock's metrics: exact math, no guesswork. Tap one to see which rules pass, fail, and what to judge yourself.
▶
Passes 2 of 2 of Peter Lynch's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- Manageable debt (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0.01
- Solid liquidity (current ratio ≥ 1.5) — now 2.54
- A simple business you understand
- Which 'type' it is (fast grower, stalwart, cyclical…)
- A believable growth story
Couldn't check from available data: PEG ≤ 1 (growth cheap vs price) — not available; Earnings growth ≥ 15% — not available
▶
Passes 2 of 2 of Vijay Kedia's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- ROE ≥ 15% — now 15.9%
- Manageable debt (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0.01
- Ambitious, capable management
- A small company with a large opportunity
- Patience to hold for years
Couldn't check from available data: Strong earnings growth ≥ 20% — not available
▶
Passes 3 of 4 of Radhakishan Damani's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- Very low debt (D/E ≤ 0.5) — now 0.01
- Consistent revenue (consistency ≥ 80%) — now 81.2%
- Positive net margin — now 12.1%
- High returns on capital (ROCE ≥ 18%) — now 12.4%
- A durable consumer franchise
- Pricing power
- A long runway, bought patiently
▶
Passes 2 of 3 of Rakesh Jhunjhunwala's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- Net margin ≥ 10% — now 12.1%
- Conservative leverage (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0.01
- ROE ≥ 18% — now 15.9%
- A large, scalable opportunity
- Trustworthy, ambitious management
- Conviction to hold through volatility
Couldn't check from available data: Earnings growth ≥ 15% — not available
▶
Passes 3 of 5 of Warren Buffett's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- ROE ≥ 15% — now 15.9%
- Net margin ≥ 10% — now 12.1%
- Conservative leverage (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0.01
- Positive free cash flow — now -0%
- Trades below intrinsic value (margin of safety ≥ 0) — now -410.2%
- A business you can understand
- A durable competitive moat
- Honest, capable management
▶
Passes 2 of 4 of Charlie Munger's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- ROE ≥ 15% — now 15.9%
- Conservative leverage (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0.01
- High returns on capital (ROCE ≥ 15%) — now 12.4%
- Trades below intrinsic value (margin of safety ≥ 0) — now -410.2%
- A high-quality, understandable business
- A durable moat
- Management of integrity
▶
Passes 3 of 6 of Benjamin Graham's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- Strong liquidity (current ratio ≥ 1.5) — now 2.54
- Debt below equity (D/E ≤ 1.0) — now 0.01
- Financially safe (Altman Z ≥ 3) — now 15.16
- P/E ≤ 15 — now 61.25
- P/B ≤ 1.5 — now 9.74
- Graham number: P/E × P/B ≤ 22.5 — now 596.6
- A long record of stable earnings
- An uninterrupted dividend history
▶
Passes 1 of 2 of Raamdeo Agrawal's numeric checks. Still judge the non-numeric criteria below for yourself.
- Longevity: revenue consistency ≥ 70% — now 81.2%
- Quality: ROCE ≥ 18% — now 12.4%
- Durability of the growth (longevity)
- Quality and honesty of management
Couldn't check from available data: Growth: earnings CAGR ≥ 15% — not available; Price: PEG ≤ 2 — not available
Financial statements (INR)
↗ sourceCash-flow lines highlighted — we trust cash over reported profit.
| Line | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 173.64B | 151.46B | 192.79B | 158.74B | — |
| Operating income | 17.27B | 17.86B | 21.29B | 16.70B | — |
| EBITDA | 25.92B | 29.92B | 29.83B | 20.65B | — |
| Net income | 21.04B | 27.17B | 19.61B | 15.43B | — |
| Operating cash flow | 3.75B | 16.55B | 14.00B | 9.79B | — |
| Capex | -3.80B | -3.42B | -2.02B | -1.56B | — |
| Free cash flow | -57.00M | 13.12B | 11.98B | 8.22B | — |
| Total assets | 199.89B | 254.08B | 217.70B | 201.09B | — |
| Total equity | 132.28B | 153.57B | 130.87B | 116.10B | — |
| Total debt | 1.45B | 2.79B | 1.75B | 1.82B | — |
| Cash & equivalents | 21.50B | 18.36B | 11.92B | 10.01B | — |